Eligibility M.A. in French plus other criteria as stipulated by the University such as entrance test.
Structure
The structure is on the lines of the M.Phil. programme of Dept. of English
(a) Coursework
1. Paper 1: Research Methodology (Theory) 100 marks
2. Paper 2: Preparing for Research 100 marks
3. Paper 3: Topic Related Practical/Contact Sessions 100 marks
(b) Dissertation
As a part fulfillment each student will be required to write a dissertation on a topic
of his/her choice under the supervision of a Pune University recognized Research
Guide. The dissertation shall be evaluated by the internal examiner (the guide) as
well as by an external examiner appointed as per the university rules. The
procedure for evaluation of dissertation, conduct of final seminar and viva voce
and the declaration of final result shall be as laid down in the university rules.
Syllabus
Paper I: Research Methodology (Theory)
Objectives
1. To equip the students with the tools and materials of research
2. To acquaint them with the research process
3. To train them in presenting their research
Contents
1. Meaning and objectives of research
2. Research in language and literature
3. Materials and tools of research (books, anthologies, thesauruses,
encyclopedias, conference proceedings, unpublished theses, newspaper articles,
journals, government publications, e-journals, web references, research sites,
printed and web indexes, etc.; e-mail discussion groups, special libraries,
advanced study centers, virtual libraries, web search engines, etc.)
2
4. The process of research (selecting a project; the survey of relevant literature;
defining aims and objectives; designing hypothesis; scope and limitations;
preparing a research proposal; planning, etc)
5. Presentation of Research (title, aims and objectives; research format; avoiding
plagiarism; quoting and creating in-text citations; research findings; using
standard style sheets)
Evaluation
There will be two components of evaluation: internal assessment and annual
examination. The internal assessment will consist of two assignments of 20
marks each. The first assignment will be based on research process and the
second on the presentation of research. The final examination will be for 60
marks. It will consist of six (out of eight) short answer questions on the sections 1
to 5.
Reference Books (in English)
Chindhade, S. and A. Thorat (2009), An Introduction to Research, Mumbai:
CUP
Oakman, Robert L. (1984), Computer Methods for Literary Research, Athens:
University of Georgia Press
Rajannan, B. (1968), Fundamentals of Research, ASRC Hyderabad
Seliger (2001), Second Language Research Methods, Oxford University
(in French)
OUVRAGES GENERAUX
ANGERS (M.) Initiation pratique à la méthodologie des sciences humaines, CEC, 1996
BLANCHET (A) Les techniques d'enquête en sciences sociales, Dunod, 1987
BEAUD (S) WEBER (F) Guide de l’enquête de terrain, La découverte, 1998
DURKHEIM (E) Les règles de la méthode, PUF, 16è éd, 1967
DUVERGER (M) Méthodes des sciences sociales, PUF, 2è éd, 1961
FESTINGER (L) Les méthodes de recherche dans les sciences sociales, 2 tomes, PUF.
FRAGNIERE (JP) Comment réussir un mémoire, Dunod, 1986
GHIGLIONE (R) Les enquêtes sociologiques, Colin, 4è éd, 1985
GOTMAN (A), BLANCHET (A) L'enquête et ses méthodes : l'entretien, Paris, Nathan
université, coll.128,1998
GRAWITZ (M) Méthodes des sciences-sociales, Dalloz, 10è éd, 1996
GRISEZ (J) Les méthodes de la psychologie sociale, PUF, 'Le psychologue', 1975
GUIBERT (J) Méthodologie des pratiques de terrain en sciences humaines et sociales, Colin,
1997.
LOUBET DEL BAYLE (J-L) Introduction aux méthodes des sciences sociales, Privat, 1978.
MACE (G) Guide d’élaboration d’un projet de recherche, De Boeck université, 2 ed,1997.
QUIVY (R) Manuel de recherche en sciences sociales, Dunod, 1988
REVAULT D’ALLONE (C) La démarche clinique en sciences humaines, Dunod, 1992
SCHUTZ (A) Le chercheur et le quotidien, Méridiens Klinksieck, 1987
3
LE QUESTIONNAIRE
JAVEAU(C): L’enquête par questionnaire, Ed. Univ. de Bruxelles, EO, 1990.
PICARD(F): Graphes et questionnaires, Dunod, 2 tomes.
LES SONDAGES
CHAMPAGNE(P): Faire l'opinion, éd de Minuit, 1990, 320p.
DEROO(M) & Coll: Pratique et analyse des enquêtes par sondage, PUF, 1980.
STOETZEL(J) & Coll: Les sondages d'opinion publique, PUF, 'Le psychologue, 1979.
DONNEES STATISTIQUES ET INFORMATIONS DIVERSES
BATIFOULIER(C) & Coll: Organiser sa documentation... La Découverte, "Guides" 1990
104p.
L'ENTRETIEN
GUITTET(A): L’entretien, Colin 3, éd,1991, 160 p.
L'ANALYSE DE CONTENU
GHIGLIONE (R) & Coll: Manuel d'analyse de contenu, Colin, coll “U”, 1990, 164p.
Paper II: Preparing for Research
Objectives
1. To acquaint the students with the latest approaches to language and literature
2. To enable them to apply these approaches to literary pieces and/or language
(natural, literary, media)
3. To inculcate the habit of making background reading with the help of various
conventional and technological sources
Contents
1. Approaches to literature: Feminism, Post-colonialism, Culture Studies
2. Approaches to language: Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis, Translation, FLE
3. Application of approaches: Each student will be required to apply at least one
approach to a literary piece like short story, poem, one-act play, novel and
play or to the French language used in literature, journalism and other media,
the Internet, day-to-day conversations, etc. The concerned teacher will
demonstrate how to apply these approaches.
4. Potential research areas in French language and literature: The teacher/s will
discuss probable areas and various possibilities of research in language and
literature. Emphasis will be given on interdisciplinarity.
5. Survey of relevant literature: Each student will be required to make a survey of
literature related to an area of his/her interest under the guidance of the
concerned teacher/s. This will include the use of various sources like libraries,
websites and search engines.
4
Evaluation
There will be two components of evaluation: internal assessment and annual
examination. The internal assessment will consist of two assignments of 20
marks each. The first assignment will be based on the approaches to literature
and language and the second on the application of these approaches. The final
examination will be for 60 marks. It will consist of six (out of eight) short answer
questions on the sections 1 to 5.
Reference Books (in English)
Section 1 General Resources
Bertens, Hans. Literary Theory: The Basics. London and New York: Routledge,
2001
Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice.
3rd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.
Dobie, Ann B. Theory into Practice: An Introduction to Literary Criticism.
Thomson, 2002.
Hall, Donald E. Literary and Cultural Theory: From Basic Principles to Advanced
Application. Boston: Houghton, 2001.
Approaches to Literature
Ashcroft, Bill. Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, eds.(2004). Key Concepts in
Post-Colonial Studies. London: Routledge
Balslev, A.N. (1996). Cross-cultural Conversation. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press.
Barker, M. & Beezer, A. (1992). Reading into Cultural Studies. London:
Routledge.
Bhabha, Homi (2006). The Location of Culture. Chennai: Viva Books
(in French)
BRETON, André, (2006) Manifestes du surréalisme, 3 ed. Gallimard, Paris.
Collectif (2006) La question post-coloniale, La découverte, Paris
DERRIDA, Jacques, (1999) Écriture et la différence, Points, Paris.
GENETTE, G. (1977) Figures III, Seuil, Paris.
GENETTE, G. (1991) Fiction et diction, Seuil, Paris.
RAMOND, Charles, (2008) Derrida la deconstruction, PUF, Paris.
RAMOND, Charles, (2001) Le vocabulaire de Derrida, Ellipse.
SARTRE, J-P, (1988) Qu’est-ce que la littérature ? Gallimard, 3edition,.
SARTRE, J-P, Sartre, A-E, (1996) L’existentialisme est un humanisme,
Gallimard, 3 ed.
Section 2 Approaches to Language
(in English)
Austin, J. L. (1962), How to do things with words, oxford: Clarendon Press.
Catford, J.C. (1965): A Linguistic Theory of Translation, Londres: Oxford
University Press.
Grundy, Peter (2000), Doing Pragmatics, London: Edward Arnold.
Leech, G. N. (1983), Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman.
5
Levinson, S. C. (1983), Pragmatics, Cambridge: CUP.
Schiffrin, D. (1994), Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, J. R. (1969), Speech Acts, Cambridge: CUP
Searle, J. R. (1970), Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language,
Cambridge: CUP.
Spender, Dale, (1994) Man made language
Thorat, Ashok (2009), Discourse Analysis. Mumbai: CUP
Thorat, Ashok (ed.) (2007), Pragmatics. Pune: IASE
Yule, George (1996), Pragmatics, Oxford: OUP.
(in French)
ADAM, Jean-Michel (1992) : Les textes: types et prototypes. Récit, description,
argumentation, explication et dialogue, Nathan, Paris .
ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude / DUCROT, Oswald (1983) : L'Argumentation dans la
langue, Liège, Mardaga.
ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude (Dir.) (1995): Théorie des topoï, Kimé, Paris.
AUSTIN, J.-L. (1970) : Quand dire c’est faire, Seuil, Paris.
BALLARD, M. (1986): La traduction: de la théorie à la didactique, Lille: Presses
Universitaires.
BÉDARD, C. (1986): La traduction technique: principes et pratique, Montreal:
Linguatech.
BENVENISTE, E., (1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale Tome I, Gallimard, Paris.
BENVENISTE, E., (1974) Problèmes de linguistique générale Tome II, Gallimard, Paris.
DABENE, L. (1994) Repères sociolinguistiques pour l’enseignement des langues,
Hachette, Paris.
DUCROT, Oswald (1972) : Dire et ne pas dire – principes de sémantique linguistique,
Hermann, Paris.
DUCROT, Oswald (1980) : Les échelles argumentatives, Minuit, Paris.
DUCROT, Oswald (1984) : Le dire et le dit , Minuit, Paris.
DUCROT, Oswald et al. (1980) : Les mots du discours, Minuit, Paris.
DURIEUX, C. (1988): Fondement didactique de la traduction technique, París:
Didier Erudition.
ELUERD, Robert (1985) : La pragmatique linguistique, Nathan, Paris.
JAYEZ, Jacques (1987) : Inférence en langue naturelle : le problème des connecteurs :
représentation et calcul , Hermès, Paris.
MOESCHLER, Jacques (1996) : Théorie pragmatique et pragmatique conversationnelle,
Colin, Paris.
MOREL, M.-A., DANON-BOILEAU, L., (1998) Grammaire de l’intonation, Ophrys, Paris
MOIRAND, Sophie, (1982) Enseigner à communiquer en langue étrangère : recherche
et application. Hachette F, Paris.
RÉCANATI, François (1981) : Les énoncés performatifs, Minuit, Paris.
ROSSARI, Corinne (2000) : Connecteurs et relations de discours : des liens entre
cognition et signification, Presses Universitaires, Nancy.
ROULET, Eddy (1999) : La description de l'organisation du discours, Didier, Paris.
ROULET, Eddy et al (2001) : Un modèle et un instrument d’analyse de
l’organisation du discours, Lang, Bern.
SAUSSURE, F. de (1916) Cours de linguistique générale, 3e édition, 1993.
6
SELESKOVITCH, D. (1975): Langage, langues et mémoire, Minard, Paris.
Paper III: Topic Related Practical/Contact Sessions
Objectives
1. To help the student to crystallize topic of research
2. To provide the student relevant and timely guidance for conducting research
3. To ensure the quality of dissertation
Contents
This paper will be conducted in the form of contact sessions. Relevant and
recognized research guides will conduct minimum 10 contact sessions of one
hour each for each topic. The contact sessions will aim at helping each student to
identify the topic, formulate aims and objectives, design hypothesis, prepare a
plan of research and make the relevant reading. The students will be required to
give seminars, make PowerPoint presentations and to actually begin their serious
research along with these sessions. The contact sessions will be spaced out over
the second and the third terms and will be treated as teaching hours.
Evaluation
Each student will be required to complete two assignments as a part of the
internal assessment; one will be home assignment based on the relevant
background reading and the other will be a PowerPoint presentation on the final
research proposal. Each assignment will carry 20 marks. The final examination
will carry 60 marks. It will consist of six (out of eight) short answer questions on
the topics ranging from identifying topic to using standard style sheets.
Structure
The structure is on the lines of the M.Phil. programme of Dept. of English
(a) Coursework
1. Paper 1: Research Methodology (Theory) 100 marks
2. Paper 2: Preparing for Research 100 marks
3. Paper 3: Topic Related Practical/Contact Sessions 100 marks
(b) Dissertation
As a part fulfillment each student will be required to write a dissertation on a topic
of his/her choice under the supervision of a Pune University recognized Research
Guide. The dissertation shall be evaluated by the internal examiner (the guide) as
well as by an external examiner appointed as per the university rules. The
procedure for evaluation of dissertation, conduct of final seminar and viva voce
and the declaration of final result shall be as laid down in the university rules.
Syllabus
Paper I: Research Methodology (Theory)
Objectives
1. To equip the students with the tools and materials of research
2. To acquaint them with the research process
3. To train them in presenting their research
Contents
1. Meaning and objectives of research
2. Research in language and literature
3. Materials and tools of research (books, anthologies, thesauruses,
encyclopedias, conference proceedings, unpublished theses, newspaper articles,
journals, government publications, e-journals, web references, research sites,
printed and web indexes, etc.; e-mail discussion groups, special libraries,
advanced study centers, virtual libraries, web search engines, etc.)
2
4. The process of research (selecting a project; the survey of relevant literature;
defining aims and objectives; designing hypothesis; scope and limitations;
preparing a research proposal; planning, etc)
5. Presentation of Research (title, aims and objectives; research format; avoiding
plagiarism; quoting and creating in-text citations; research findings; using
standard style sheets)
Evaluation
There will be two components of evaluation: internal assessment and annual
examination. The internal assessment will consist of two assignments of 20
marks each. The first assignment will be based on research process and the
second on the presentation of research. The final examination will be for 60
marks. It will consist of six (out of eight) short answer questions on the sections 1
to 5.
Reference Books (in English)
Chindhade, S. and A. Thorat (2009), An Introduction to Research, Mumbai:
CUP
Oakman, Robert L. (1984), Computer Methods for Literary Research, Athens:
University of Georgia Press
Rajannan, B. (1968), Fundamentals of Research, ASRC Hyderabad
Seliger (2001), Second Language Research Methods, Oxford University
(in French)
OUVRAGES GENERAUX
ANGERS (M.) Initiation pratique à la méthodologie des sciences humaines, CEC, 1996
BLANCHET (A) Les techniques d'enquête en sciences sociales, Dunod, 1987
BEAUD (S) WEBER (F) Guide de l’enquête de terrain, La découverte, 1998
DURKHEIM (E) Les règles de la méthode, PUF, 16è éd, 1967
DUVERGER (M) Méthodes des sciences sociales, PUF, 2è éd, 1961
FESTINGER (L) Les méthodes de recherche dans les sciences sociales, 2 tomes, PUF.
FRAGNIERE (JP) Comment réussir un mémoire, Dunod, 1986
GHIGLIONE (R) Les enquêtes sociologiques, Colin, 4è éd, 1985
GOTMAN (A), BLANCHET (A) L'enquête et ses méthodes : l'entretien, Paris, Nathan
université, coll.128,1998
GRAWITZ (M) Méthodes des sciences-sociales, Dalloz, 10è éd, 1996
GRISEZ (J) Les méthodes de la psychologie sociale, PUF, 'Le psychologue', 1975
GUIBERT (J) Méthodologie des pratiques de terrain en sciences humaines et sociales, Colin,
1997.
LOUBET DEL BAYLE (J-L) Introduction aux méthodes des sciences sociales, Privat, 1978.
MACE (G) Guide d’élaboration d’un projet de recherche, De Boeck université, 2 ed,1997.
QUIVY (R) Manuel de recherche en sciences sociales, Dunod, 1988
REVAULT D’ALLONE (C) La démarche clinique en sciences humaines, Dunod, 1992
SCHUTZ (A) Le chercheur et le quotidien, Méridiens Klinksieck, 1987
3
LE QUESTIONNAIRE
JAVEAU(C): L’enquête par questionnaire, Ed. Univ. de Bruxelles, EO, 1990.
PICARD(F): Graphes et questionnaires, Dunod, 2 tomes.
LES SONDAGES
CHAMPAGNE(P): Faire l'opinion, éd de Minuit, 1990, 320p.
DEROO(M) & Coll: Pratique et analyse des enquêtes par sondage, PUF, 1980.
STOETZEL(J) & Coll: Les sondages d'opinion publique, PUF, 'Le psychologue, 1979.
DONNEES STATISTIQUES ET INFORMATIONS DIVERSES
BATIFOULIER(C) & Coll: Organiser sa documentation... La Découverte, "Guides" 1990
104p.
L'ENTRETIEN
GUITTET(A): L’entretien, Colin 3, éd,1991, 160 p.
L'ANALYSE DE CONTENU
GHIGLIONE (R) & Coll: Manuel d'analyse de contenu, Colin, coll “U”, 1990, 164p.
Paper II: Preparing for Research
Objectives
1. To acquaint the students with the latest approaches to language and literature
2. To enable them to apply these approaches to literary pieces and/or language
(natural, literary, media)
3. To inculcate the habit of making background reading with the help of various
conventional and technological sources
Contents
1. Approaches to literature: Feminism, Post-colonialism, Culture Studies
2. Approaches to language: Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis, Translation, FLE
3. Application of approaches: Each student will be required to apply at least one
approach to a literary piece like short story, poem, one-act play, novel and
play or to the French language used in literature, journalism and other media,
the Internet, day-to-day conversations, etc. The concerned teacher will
demonstrate how to apply these approaches.
4. Potential research areas in French language and literature: The teacher/s will
discuss probable areas and various possibilities of research in language and
literature. Emphasis will be given on interdisciplinarity.
5. Survey of relevant literature: Each student will be required to make a survey of
literature related to an area of his/her interest under the guidance of the
concerned teacher/s. This will include the use of various sources like libraries,
websites and search engines.
4
Evaluation
There will be two components of evaluation: internal assessment and annual
examination. The internal assessment will consist of two assignments of 20
marks each. The first assignment will be based on the approaches to literature
and language and the second on the application of these approaches. The final
examination will be for 60 marks. It will consist of six (out of eight) short answer
questions on the sections 1 to 5.
Reference Books (in English)
Section 1 General Resources
Bertens, Hans. Literary Theory: The Basics. London and New York: Routledge,
2001
Bressler, Charles E. Literary Criticism: An Introduction to Theory and Practice.
3rd Ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.
Dobie, Ann B. Theory into Practice: An Introduction to Literary Criticism.
Thomson, 2002.
Hall, Donald E. Literary and Cultural Theory: From Basic Principles to Advanced
Application. Boston: Houghton, 2001.
Approaches to Literature
Ashcroft, Bill. Gareth Griffiths, and Helen Tiffin, eds.(2004). Key Concepts in
Post-Colonial Studies. London: Routledge
Balslev, A.N. (1996). Cross-cultural Conversation. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press.
Barker, M. & Beezer, A. (1992). Reading into Cultural Studies. London:
Routledge.
Bhabha, Homi (2006). The Location of Culture. Chennai: Viva Books
(in French)
BRETON, André, (2006) Manifestes du surréalisme, 3 ed. Gallimard, Paris.
Collectif (2006) La question post-coloniale, La découverte, Paris
DERRIDA, Jacques, (1999) Écriture et la différence, Points, Paris.
GENETTE, G. (1977) Figures III, Seuil, Paris.
GENETTE, G. (1991) Fiction et diction, Seuil, Paris.
RAMOND, Charles, (2008) Derrida la deconstruction, PUF, Paris.
RAMOND, Charles, (2001) Le vocabulaire de Derrida, Ellipse.
SARTRE, J-P, (1988) Qu’est-ce que la littérature ? Gallimard, 3edition,.
SARTRE, J-P, Sartre, A-E, (1996) L’existentialisme est un humanisme,
Gallimard, 3 ed.
Section 2 Approaches to Language
(in English)
Austin, J. L. (1962), How to do things with words, oxford: Clarendon Press.
Catford, J.C. (1965): A Linguistic Theory of Translation, Londres: Oxford
University Press.
Grundy, Peter (2000), Doing Pragmatics, London: Edward Arnold.
Leech, G. N. (1983), Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman.
5
Levinson, S. C. (1983), Pragmatics, Cambridge: CUP.
Schiffrin, D. (1994), Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Searle, J. R. (1969), Speech Acts, Cambridge: CUP
Searle, J. R. (1970), Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language,
Cambridge: CUP.
Spender, Dale, (1994) Man made language
Thorat, Ashok (2009), Discourse Analysis. Mumbai: CUP
Thorat, Ashok (ed.) (2007), Pragmatics. Pune: IASE
Yule, George (1996), Pragmatics, Oxford: OUP.
(in French)
ADAM, Jean-Michel (1992) : Les textes: types et prototypes. Récit, description,
argumentation, explication et dialogue, Nathan, Paris .
ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude / DUCROT, Oswald (1983) : L'Argumentation dans la
langue, Liège, Mardaga.
ANSCOMBRE, Jean-Claude (Dir.) (1995): Théorie des topoï, Kimé, Paris.
AUSTIN, J.-L. (1970) : Quand dire c’est faire, Seuil, Paris.
BALLARD, M. (1986): La traduction: de la théorie à la didactique, Lille: Presses
Universitaires.
BÉDARD, C. (1986): La traduction technique: principes et pratique, Montreal:
Linguatech.
BENVENISTE, E., (1966) Problèmes de linguistique générale Tome I, Gallimard, Paris.
BENVENISTE, E., (1974) Problèmes de linguistique générale Tome II, Gallimard, Paris.
DABENE, L. (1994) Repères sociolinguistiques pour l’enseignement des langues,
Hachette, Paris.
DUCROT, Oswald (1972) : Dire et ne pas dire – principes de sémantique linguistique,
Hermann, Paris.
DUCROT, Oswald (1980) : Les échelles argumentatives, Minuit, Paris.
DUCROT, Oswald (1984) : Le dire et le dit , Minuit, Paris.
DUCROT, Oswald et al. (1980) : Les mots du discours, Minuit, Paris.
DURIEUX, C. (1988): Fondement didactique de la traduction technique, París:
Didier Erudition.
ELUERD, Robert (1985) : La pragmatique linguistique, Nathan, Paris.
JAYEZ, Jacques (1987) : Inférence en langue naturelle : le problème des connecteurs :
représentation et calcul , Hermès, Paris.
MOESCHLER, Jacques (1996) : Théorie pragmatique et pragmatique conversationnelle,
Colin, Paris.
MOREL, M.-A., DANON-BOILEAU, L., (1998) Grammaire de l’intonation, Ophrys, Paris
MOIRAND, Sophie, (1982) Enseigner à communiquer en langue étrangère : recherche
et application. Hachette F, Paris.
RÉCANATI, François (1981) : Les énoncés performatifs, Minuit, Paris.
ROSSARI, Corinne (2000) : Connecteurs et relations de discours : des liens entre
cognition et signification, Presses Universitaires, Nancy.
ROULET, Eddy (1999) : La description de l'organisation du discours, Didier, Paris.
ROULET, Eddy et al (2001) : Un modèle et un instrument d’analyse de
l’organisation du discours, Lang, Bern.
SAUSSURE, F. de (1916) Cours de linguistique générale, 3e édition, 1993.
6
SELESKOVITCH, D. (1975): Langage, langues et mémoire, Minard, Paris.
Paper III: Topic Related Practical/Contact Sessions
Objectives
1. To help the student to crystallize topic of research
2. To provide the student relevant and timely guidance for conducting research
3. To ensure the quality of dissertation
Contents
This paper will be conducted in the form of contact sessions. Relevant and
recognized research guides will conduct minimum 10 contact sessions of one
hour each for each topic. The contact sessions will aim at helping each student to
identify the topic, formulate aims and objectives, design hypothesis, prepare a
plan of research and make the relevant reading. The students will be required to
give seminars, make PowerPoint presentations and to actually begin their serious
research along with these sessions. The contact sessions will be spaced out over
the second and the third terms and will be treated as teaching hours.
Evaluation
Each student will be required to complete two assignments as a part of the
internal assessment; one will be home assignment based on the relevant
background reading and the other will be a PowerPoint presentation on the final
research proposal. Each assignment will carry 20 marks. The final examination
will carry 60 marks. It will consist of six (out of eight) short answer questions on
the topics ranging from identifying topic to using standard style sheets.
